USCIS Adjudicative Hold on Nationals of “Travel Ban” Countries: Legal, Economic, and Human Consequences
- Dr. Hooman Movassagh
- Feb 6
- 2 min read
Legal framework and implementation
Presidential Proclamation 10998 (Dec. 16, 2025), issued pursuant to INA §212(f), reinstates and expands entry restrictions for nationals of dozens of countries identified as presenting alleged information-sharing or security deficiencies. In response, USCIS issued Policy Memoranda PM 602-0192 (Dec. 2, 2025) and PM 602-0194 (Jan. 1, 2026), instructing adjudicators to place mandatory holds on pending benefit applications involving individuals who are citizens of the listed countries.
The resulting pause applies to both immigrant and nonimmigrant benefits, including adjustment of status (Form I-485), naturalization (Form N-400), removal of conditions (Form I-751), employment-based petitions, changes of status, optional practical training (OPT) for recent graduates, and reentry permits. Notably, the policy also calls for re-review of certain approvals issued after January 20, 2021, undermining the finality of prior adjudications.
Parallel action by the Department of State has effectively halted immigrant visa processing for many of the same nationals, compounding the impact and foreclosing lawful immigration pathways from both inside and outside the United States.
Departure from individualized adjudication
This policy does not reflect case-by-case security review. Instead, it functions as a blanket, nationality-based suspension layered atop existing biometric, biographic, and interagency vetting processes. Congress has not expressly authorized USCIS to impose indefinite, categorical adjudicative freezes of this nature, particularly where applicants have complied with all statutory and regulatory requirements.
Economic and workforce implications
The adjudicative hold directly affects employers and critical sectors of the U.S. economy. Already-vetted workers - many in healthcare, STEM, and other shortage occupations - are unable to finalize status, change employers, or plan long-term. Hospitals, universities, and businesses face prolonged uncertainty, despite having relied on a predictable adjudication framework.
Empirical data consistently show that reduced legal immigration slows job growth, suppresses GDP, and exacerbates labor shortages. By freezing cases already in the pipeline, the policy converts lawful immigration into prolonged limbo without advancing measurable security gains.
Human and rule-of-law concerns
Family-based and humanitarian cases are equally affected, leaving spouses, children, and parents in extended uncertainty after years of compliance and waiting. Delays in naturalization and removal-of-conditions filings prolong temporary or conditional status for individuals who are otherwise eligible for permanent civic integration.
The retroactive re-review of approved cases raises significant due process and reliance concerns for families and employers who structured their lives and operations based on finalized agency decisions.
Call to action
The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) is actively engaged in advocacy efforts to challenge these adjudicative holds and to demand transparency, accountability, and adherence to the rule of law.
Meaningful change requires engagement. We encourage practitioners, employers, and affected individuals to review AILA’s advocacy initiatives, stay informed, and participate in coordinated efforts to urge USCIS to resume lawful, individualized adjudication. To this end, we have prepared a short video to explain how you can take action through AILA.
Legal immigration cannot function where compliance is met with indefinite delay.
https://www.aila.org/advocacy-tools/aila-s-advocacy-action-center
https://www.americanbar.org/advocacy/governmental_legislative_work/grassroots-action-center/How-To-Get-Involved/
#ImmigrationLaw #LegalImmigration #USCIS #DueProcess #RuleOfLaw
Comments